• Home
  • Current congress
  • Public Website
  • My papers
  • root
  • browse
  • IAC-08
  • B3
  • 3
  • paper
  • Integration of Russian Segment Payloads on the ISS Using the Space Station Remote Manipulator System

    Paper number

    IAC-08.B3.3.6

    Author

    Mr. Robert Corcoran, MDA Space Missions, Canada

    Year

    2008

    Abstract

    As part of the remaining ISS assembled operations, there are presently three critical Russian supplied payloads which must be integrated. These payloads are the Russian Mini Research Module 1 (MRM1) , Docking Compartment 2 (DC2), and the Multipurpose Laboratory Module (MLM). These Russian payloads were originally designed to be docked via a Progress or Soyuz vehicle, with the respective vehicle applying a high-load berthing force ( 80-100N) required to initially latch, with the payload’s docking mechanism completing rigidizing docking operation. For ISS safety reasons, accessibility for Progress-aided berthing is not possible in all desired docking positions, prompting the use of the SSRMS to support the relocation and berthing of some of the Russian payloads. This project began with the retrofitting and relocation of the already-on-station DC1 module, and evolved to the installation of DC2 and MRM1. At the present time, the DC2 module is still planned to be docked using an attached Progress, while MRM1 will fly on the ULF4 Shuttle mission in early 2010, transferred by the Shuttle Remote Manipulator System (SRMS) to the SSRMS, which will then translate and berth the MRM1. MLM remains an “on the horizon” payload which may also require SSRMS support.

    While the proven track record of the SSRMS in ISS assembly makes it a natural solution to this problem, there are still a number of challenges to overcome. Assembly approaches, interface protocols, and final procedures must be coordinated between multiple space agencies (CSA, NASA, RSC). The Russian segment FGB grapple fixture provides 30

    The paper describes the mission evolution and analysis sequencing, and the engineering efforts undertaken to assess and address mission risks. The key risks identified and the chosen mitigation strategies and engineering solutions are discussed.

    This is an original paper which will be written for IAC 2008. MDA will provide the funding to make the author of this paper available for IAC 2008.

    Abstract document

    IAC-08.B3.3.6.pdf

    Manuscript document

    IAC-08.B3.3.6.pdf (🔒 authorized access only).

    To get the manuscript, please contact IAF Secretariat.