• Home
  • Current congress
  • Public Website
  • My papers
  • root
  • browse
  • IAC-16
  • A6
  • 2
  • paper
  • Study of Disposal Options for Reducing the Future Debris Environment in Medium Earth Orbit

    Paper number

    IAC-16,A6,2,6,x34187

    Coauthor

    Mr. Alan B. Jenkin, The Aerospace Corporation, United States

    Coauthor

    Mr. Marlon Sorge, United States

    Coauthor

    Dr. Glenn Peterson, The Aerospace Corporation, United States

    Coauthor

    Dr. John McVey, Affiliated with The Aerospace Corporation, United States

    Year

    2016

    Abstract
    Disposal guidance in the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC) debris mitigation guidelines currently treats medium Earth orbit (MEO) (altitude range from 2,000 km to 35,586 km) as an unrestricted region for storage disposal orbits. A previous study showed that consistent usage of MEO storage disposal orbits will result in quadratic growth of the MEO debris population. This growth trend occurs because the majority of MEO storage disposal orbits resulting from missions as they are currently planned do not decay.
    
    In the current study, two disposal options for reducing the growth rate of the MEO debris population were considered. In Disposal Option 1, missions are designed to avoid leaving upper stages on MEO storage disposal orbits. In Disposal Option 2, eccentricity growth of MEO constellation disposal orbits is used to reduce collision risk and, if possible, cause eventual atmospheric reentry. Both options are achievable if they are considered during early mission design.
    
    An analysis was performed to determine the effectiveness of these disposal options. The Aerospace Debris Environment Projection Tool (ADEPT) was used to simulate the future debris environment down to 1 cm over 500 years for three disposal scenarios. The extended projection time was chosen to fully examine the effects of eccentricity growth. In Scenario 1, 100% of future missions comply with the current IADC disposal guidelines. This results in the accumulation of objects, mostly rocket bodies, in MEO storage disposal orbits. In Scenario 2, world-wide upper stages are not permitted to use MEO storage disposal orbits, forcing most of them to use 25-year decay orbits or storage disposal orbits above GEO. This represents world-wide implementation of Disposal Option 1. In Scenario 3, the disposal orbits of all satellites in MEO global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), and of GNSS-associated rocket bodies left in MEO, are configured for high eccentricity growth.
    
    Results of the study for Scenario 1 confirm quadratic growth of the MEO collisional debris population. Results also show an average reduction in collisional debris in the GNSS altitude region by approximately one-third in Scenario 2 and by approximately two-thirds in Scenario 3. The paper discusses the details of the simulation setup, plots of simulated collision events vs. altitude and time, and on-orbit collisional debris population count vs. time. The collision avoidance frequency for the GNSS operational satellites in all three scenarios is presented.
    Abstract document

    IAC-16,A6,2,6,x34187.brief.pdf

    Manuscript document

    IAC-16,A6,2,6,x34187.pdf (🔒 authorized access only).

    To get the manuscript, please contact IAF Secretariat.