• Home
  • Current congress
  • Public Website
  • My papers
  • root
  • browse
  • IAC-16
  • C1
  • IP
  • paper
  • Modelling Coorbital Motion in Curvilinear Coordinates

    Paper number

    IAC-16,C1,IP,12,x35467

    Coauthor

    Dr. Claudio Bombardelli, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Spain

    Coauthor

    Mr. Pablo Bernal Mencia, Technical University of Madrid (UPM), Spain

    Year

    2016

    Abstract
    Even within the simplifiying assumption of circular restricted three
    body problem (CRTBP) coorbital motion exhibits an extraordinarily
    rich dynamical behaviour. The three main classes of relative orbital
    motion, namely the tadpole, horseshoe and quasi-satellite state can
    be difficult to model and predict analytically, especially in the
    region near to the second primary {[}Brasser et al., Icarus 2004{]}.
    In addition, hybrid combinations and transitions between the main
    coorbital states are common and even more difficult to predict. The
    complex transition mechanism, in particular, has been shown to occur
    at relatively high values of the eccentricity and/or inclination of
    the secondary {[}Namouni 1999{]}.
    
    The literature dealing with coorbital motion is enormous and ranges
    from purely numerical studies (from the early work by Wiegert et al.
    {[}AJ 2000{]}, to the very recent work of Morais and Namouni {[}CMDA2016{]})
    to complex mathematical methods developed mainly on the Hamiltonian
    formalism, averaging methods and perturbation theory (see {[}Robutel
    et al. Comp. Appl. Math 2015{]}). In general, one important aspects
    characterizing several works in the literature is the importance of
    the formulation employed and the effort to deal with singularities
    near interesting regions of the coorbital dynamics (see for instance
    {[}Nesvorny et al. CMDA 2002{]}).
    
    Recently, one of these authors obtained an accurate description of
    relative motion with respect to a circular orbit using curvilinear
    coordinartes {[}Bombardelli et al. CMDA 2016{]}. The solution, valid
    for large eccentricities (up to 0.4-0.45) and inclinations (up to
    30-40 deg), is here generalized to the CRTBP by adding the perturbing
    effect of the second primary, which is used at the same time as the
    reference for the definition of the curvilinear coordinates. The full
    non-linear equations of motions are derived in curvilinear coordinates
    together with all relevant relations (Jacoby Constant, disturbing
    potential, etc.). Next a perturbation approach is employed to model
    the CRTBP drift motion starting from a Keplerian relative motion solution,
    providing new analytical relations describing the amplitude and drift
    rate of the horseshoe helicoidal motion with good accuracy sufficiently
    far from the second primary. Finally, the new formulation is applied
    to the description of quasi-satellite orbits, which in spite of the
    impossibility of deriving a sufficiently accurate analytical solution
    can still be used to predict important qualitative aspects of the
    motion.
    Abstract document

    IAC-16,C1,IP,12,x35467.brief.pdf

    Manuscript document

    (absent)