Exploration Health Risks: Probabalistic Risk Assessment
- Paper number
IAC-06-A1.7.-A2.7.09
- Author
Dr. Jennifer Rhatigan, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)/Johnson Space Center, United States
- Coauthor
Dr. John Charles, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)/Johnson Space Center, United States
- Coauthor
Ms. Judith Hayes, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), United States
- Coauthor
Mr. Kiley Wren, Lockheed Martin, United States
- Year
2006
- Abstract
Purpose: Maintenance of human health on long-duration exploration missions is a primary challenge to mission designers. Indeed, human health risks are currently the largest risk contributors to the risks of evacuation or loss of the crew on long-duration International Space Station missions. We describe a quantitative assessment of the relative probabilities of occurrence of the individual risks to human safety and efficiency during space flight to augment qualitative assessments used in this field to date. Quantitative probabilistic risk assessments will allow program managers to focus resources on those human health risks most likely to occur with undesirable consequences. Truly quantitative assessments are common, even expected, in the engineering and actuarial spheres, but that capability is just emerging in some arenas of life sciences research, such as identifying and minimize the hazards to astronauts during future space exploration missions. Our expectation is that these results can be used to inform NASA mission design trade studies in the near future with the objective of preventing the higher among the human health risks. Methodology: We identify and discuss statistical techniques to provide this risk quantification based on relevant sets of astronaut biomedical data from short and long duration space flights as well as relevant analog populations. We outline critical assumptions made in the calculations and discuss the rationale for these. Our efforts to date have focussed on quantifying the probabilities of medical risks that are qualitatively perceived as relatively high: risks of radiation sickness, cardiac dysrhythmias, medically significant renal stone formation due to increased calcium mobilization, decompression sickness as a result of EVA (extravehicular activity), and bone fracture due to loss of bone mineral density. Results: We present these quantitative probabilities in order-of-magnitude comparison format so that relative risk can be gauged. We address the effects of conservative and non-conservative assumptions on the probablility results. We discuss the methods necessary to assess mission risks once exploration mission scenarios are characterized. Conclusions: Preliminary efforts have produced results that are commensurate with earlier qualitative estimates of risk probabilities in this and other operational contexts, indicating that our approach may be usefully applied in support of the development of human health and performance standards for long-duration space exploration missions. This approach will also enable mission-specific probabalistic risk assessments for space exploration missions.
- Abstract document
- Manuscript document
IAC-06-A1.7.-A2.7.09.pdf (🔒 authorized access only).
To get the manuscript, please contact IAF Secretariat.