• Home
  • Current congress
  • Public Website
  • My papers
  • root
  • browse
  • IAC-16
  • A1
  • 2
  • paper
  • G-level independent radius alterations affect cardiovascular responses to centrifugation

    Paper number

    IAC-16,A1,2,5,x32119

    Coauthor

    Mr. Charles Laing, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Germany

    Year

    2016

    Abstract
    Exposure to microgravity causes a head-ward fluid shift that current spaceflight countermeasures fail to fully ameliorate. Artificial gravity (AG) through short-arm human centrifugation (SAHC) has been proposed as a possible countermeasure. Whilst the responses to increasing g-levels are well characterized , the effects of a shift in rotational axis position (RAP), independent of g-level, are not known.
    We hypothesized that a shift in RAP to in-body rotation (IBR) at heart-level, with comparable g-level at the feet, would have a beneficial effect on g-tolerance through supported cerebral perfusion from head-ward arterial pressure increases.
    To test our hypothesis we performed a study with twenty  (10 male; 10 female) healthy participants (mean +/- SE; age: 26.2 +/- 0.9 yrs and BMI: 22.9 +/- 0.4 kg.m-2) who underwent passive short-arm centrifugation, in which profiles were randomized, for periods of 10 min five times per day on two separate days, two months apart. Each centrifuge profile consisted of one of three centers of rotation (either above the head – P1; apex of the head – P2 or IBR at heart-level – P3) at one of three different g-levels (either 1.0 +Gz – G1; 1.7 +Gz – G2; or 2.4 +Gz at the feet – G3).
    Cerebral perfusion (cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy for tissue saturation index, cTSI), central volume loss (strain gauge plethysmography for calf circumference, CC) and cardiovascular response for heart rate (HR) were all continuously measured. G-tolerance to each position was obtained by recording the number of participant centrifuge runs with pre-syncopal symptoms (PSS).
    In the last minute at 2.4 gz, $\Delta$CC increases were attenuated from P1 (5.02 ± 0.24 mm) to P3 (2.72 +/- 0.13 mm, p $<$ 0.05) and $\Delta$HR from P1 (41 +/- 2 bpm) to P3 (9 +/- 1 bpm, p $<$ 0.05). ΔcTSI decreases were attenuated from P1 (-4.14 +/- 0.31 %) to P3 (-1.03 +/- 0.13 %, p $<$ 0.05) and overall the proportion of participants experiencing PSS (non-finishers) was significantly less at P3 compared to P1 (p $<$ 0.05). However, the inter-relationship of $\Delta$cTSI and $\Delta$CC remained independent of RAP, suggesting IBR was a reduced orthostatic challenge as opposed to supportive of cerebral perfusion.
    The present data demonstrate that RAP has an influencing factor on cardiovascular response similar to well characterized g-level effects.  Specifically, a RAP shift towards the heart being comparable to reducing g-level. Thus, future centrifuge studies would benefit from considering RAP in addition to g-level.
    Abstract document

    IAC-16,A1,2,5,x32119.brief.pdf

    Manuscript document

    (absent)