• Home
  • Current congress
  • Public Website
  • My papers
  • root
  • browse
  • IAC-19
  • A3
  • 1
  • paper
  • Robotic Lunar Surface Operations 2

    Paper number

    IAC-19,A3,1,6,x49646

    Author

    Mr. Alex Austin, United States, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Coauthor

    Mr. Brent Sherwood, United States

    Coauthor

    Mr. John Elliott, United States, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Coauthor

    Mr. Miles Smith, United States, Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Coauthor

    Mr. Raul Polit Casillas, United States, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Coauthor

    Dr. A. Scott Howe, United States, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Coauthor

    Dr. Anthony Colaprete, United States

    Coauthor

    Dr. Philip Metzger, United States, NASA

    Coauthor

    Dr. Kris Zacny, United States, Honeybee Robotics

    Coauthor

    Dr. Harrison Schmitt, United States

    Coauthor

    Dr. Sandra Magnus, United States, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)

    Coauthor

    Dr. Michael Sims, United States

    Coauthor

    Dr. Terry Fong, United States, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Ames Research Center

    Year

    2019

    Abstract
    Results are reported from a new lunar base study with a concise architectural program: build and operate a human-tended base that produces enough oxygen and hydrogen from lunar polar ice resources for four flights per year of a reusable lander shuttling between Gateway and the base.
    The study examines for the modern era issues first developed and reconciled by the RLSO study published in 1990 and resurrected at the 69th IAC in Bremen. The new study updates key assumptions for 1) resources – lunar polar ice instead of ilmenite; 2) solar power – polar lighting conditions instead of the 28-day equatorial lunation cycle; 3) transportation – use of multiple flight systems now in development and planning; 4) base site planning – a range of options near, straddling, and inside permanently shadowed regions; 5) ISRU scenarios – for harvesting ice and for constructing radiation shielding from regolith. 
    As did the original study, RLSO2 combines US experts in mission design, space architecture, robotic surface operations, autonomy, ISRU, operations analysis, and human space mission and lunar surface experience. Unlike the original study, the new study uses contemporary tools: CAD engineering of purpose-design base elements, and integrated performance captured in a numerical operations model. This allows rapid iteration to converge system sizing, and builds a legacy analysis tool that can assess the performance benefits and impacts of any proposed system element in the context of the overall base.
    The paper presents an overview of the groundrules, assumptions, methodology, operations model, element designs, base site plan, and quantitative findings. These findings include the performance of various regolith and ice resource utilization schemes as a function of base location and lunar surface parameters. The paper closes with short lists of the highest priority experiments and demonstrations needed on the lunar surface to retire key planning unknowns.
    Abstract document

    IAC-19,A3,1,6,x49646.brief.pdf

    Manuscript document

    IAC-19,A3,1,6,x49646.pdf (🔒 authorized access only).

    To get the manuscript, please contact IAF Secretariat.