• Home
  • Current congress
  • Public Website
  • My papers
  • root
  • browse
  • IAC-22
  • A6
  • 8-E9.1
  • paper
  • the space sustainability rating: an operational process incentivizing operators to implement sustainable design and operation practices

    Paper number

    IAC-22,A6,8-E9.1,8,x70969

    Author

    Mr. Adrien Saada, Switzerland, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)

    Coauthor

    Ms. Emmanuelle David, Switzerland, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)

    Coauthor

    Prof. Jean-Paul Kneib, Switzerland, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)

    Coauthor

    Mr. Florian Micco, Switzerland, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)

    Coauthor

    Mr. Mathieu Udriot, Switzerland, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)

    Coauthor

    Dr. Francesca Letizia, Germany, European Space Agency (ESA)

    Coauthor

    Mr. Stijn Lemmens, Germany, European Space Agency (ESA)

    Coauthor

    Dr. Minoo Rathnasabapathy, United States, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

    Coauthor

    Prof. Danielle Wood, United States, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

    Coauthor

    Prof. Moriba Jah, United States, The University of Texas at Austin

    Coauthor

    Mr. Nikolai Khlystov,, United States

    Coauthor

    Mr. Simon Potter, United Kingdom, Bryce Space and Technology

    Coauthor

    Mr. Dennis Weber, Germany, TU Darmstadt

    Coauthor

    Mr. Miles Lifson, United States, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

    Coauthor

    Ms. Kristi Acuff, United States

    Coauthor

    Mr. Riley Steindl, United States, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

    Coauthor

    Ms. Maya Slavin, United States, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

    Year

    2022

    Abstract
    In 2021, more than one million objects larger than 1cm are orbiting the Earth \footnote {Source: European Space Agency https://sdup.esoc.esa.int/discosweb/statistics/}, posing significant challenges to current and future operations in the space environment. They also present a risk of affecting people on earth, in case of loss or disruption of space-based infrastructures or activities due to a collision or an explosion. Given the growing number of government and commercial actors, plans of mega constellations, and the complexity if the landscape with standards, norms, and guidelines, there is a critical need to consider implementing tools that will incentivize space actors to foster responsible behavior and implement debris mitigation and remediation measures in order to ensure long-term sustainability of the space environment. \\ 
    
    The Space Sustainability Rating was first conceptualized within the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on Space Technologies, with the goal of providing a standardized and flexible tool to measure the sustainability level of a mission. Developed during the past two years by an international, transdisciplinary consortium consisting of BryceTech, the European Space Agency (ESA), the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Media Lab, the University of Texas at Austin, and the World Economic Forum (WEF), the Space Sustainability Rating provides an assessment system to encourage mission designs that are compatible with sustainable and responsible operations, as well as on-orbit behaviors that reduce potential damage to the orbital environment and impact on other operators. Designed as a composite indicator, the SSR consists of six modules highlighting key related decisions faced by space operators in all phases of the mission. In 2021, the EPFL Space Center (eSpace) has been selected to host and operate the Space Sustainability Rating with the target to start operations in early 2022. \\
    
    This paper will provide an overview on the Space Sustainability Rating process and will highlight how it constitutes an active incentive for operators to implement sustainable behaviors. The process of rating a mission will be described, including a brief description of the modules, a description of the input gathering phase, computational phase, and results communication phase. An emphasis on the SSR recommendations will be further explored, showing how rating’s results are analyzed and how several areas of improvement are identified during a feedback process loop. Finally, a description of the future rating process optimization will be presented by introducing the structure of the future rating platform that is being developed at eSpace.
    Abstract document

    IAC-22,A6,8-E9.1,8,x70969.brief.pdf

    Manuscript document

    IAC-22,A6,8-E9.1,8,x70969.pdf (🔒 authorized access only).

    To get the manuscript, please contact IAF Secretariat.