Technology Readiness & Risk Assessments: A New Approach

Paper number

IAC-07-D3.4.-D3.5-E5.5.07

Author

Mr. John C. Mankins, ARTEMIS Innovation Management Solutions, LLC, United States

Year

2007

Abstract

Systems that depend upon the application of new technologies inevitably face three major challenges during development: performance, schedule and budget.  Technology research and development programs are typically advocated based on argument that these investments will substantially reduce the uncertainty in all three of these dimensions of project management.   However, if early technology is implemented poorly, then the new system developments that plan to employ the resulting advanced technologies will suffer from cost overruns, schedule delays and the steady erosion of initial performance objectives.   It is often critical for senior management to be able to determine which of these two paths is more likely—and to respond accordingly.  The challenge for system and technology managers is to be able to make clear, well-documented assessments of technology readiness and risks, and to do so at key points in the life cycle of the program. 

Several approaches have been used to evaluate technology maturity and risk in order to better anticipate later system development risks.  The “technology readiness levels” (TRLs), developed by NASA, are one discipline-independent, programmatic figure of merit (FOM) that allows more effective assessment of, and communication regarding the maturity of new technologies.  Another broadly used management tool is of the “risk matrix”, which depends upon a graphical representation of uncertainty and consequences. However, for the most part these various methodologies have had no explicit interrelationship.

This paper will examine past uses of current methods to improve technology research and development outcomes and will highlight some of the limitations that can arise.  In this context, a new concept for the integration of the TRL methodology, and the concept of the “Risk Matrix” will be described.  The paper will conclude with observations concerning prospective future directions for the important new concept of integrated “technology readiness and risk assessments”.

Abstract document

IAC-07-D3.4.-D3.5-E5.5.07.pdf

Manuscript document

IAC-07-D3.4.-D3.5-E5.5.07.pdf (🔒 authorized access only).

To get the manuscript, please contact IAF Secretariat.